Transcript
HostWe often think of laws as things that take months of arguing and voting in big rooms full of people. But then we see a news story about a leader just picking up a pen and changing how a whole country works with one signature. It feels like a bit of a cheat code. How does one person get to make the rules without going through the usual voting process?
GuestIt does look like a shortcut, and in some ways, it is. But a good way to see it's that the group who votes on laws usually writes the big, broad goals. They might say, we want clean air. But they don't want to spend their days deciding exactly how much soot can come out of a specific factory pipe in one town. So they pass a law that says, make the air clean, and then they hand the keys to the leader. That leader uses an order to tell their teams exactly what to do to reach that goal. It's like a boss giving a job to a worker. The boss sets the goal, and the worker decides which tools to use and how to spend the day.
HostSo the leader isn't actually making a brand new law from scratch? They're just filling in the blanks of a law that's already there?
GuestMostly, yeah. Think of a law like a big, empty house. The people who vote built the walls and the roof. But they didn't put in the rugs or the chairs. The leader uses these orders to move the furniture around. They can't build a new room or tear down a wall, but they have a lot of say in how the house is used from day to day. Now, they also get some power straight from the big rule book that started the country. For example, it says they're the head of the army. So they can give orders to the military without asking anyone else. That's their space to run, and the orders are how they do it.
HostWait, that sounds like way too much power. If the leader decides how to move the furniture, couldn't they just decide all the chairs belong in the yard? Where does the line get drawn?
GuestWell, that's where things get messy. There was a big fight about this back in the fifties. The country was at war, and the workers at the steel mills were about to go on strike. The leader at the time thought, we need that steel for the war, so I'm just going to take over the mills. He signed an order to have the government run the factories. He said his power as the head of the army let him do it because it was a time of war. But the courts stepped in and said, hold on. You can't just take over private land or businesses because you feel like it. They ruled that since the group that makes laws had actually said no to that kind of move before, the leader couldn't just go over their heads. It showed that these orders aren't magic. If there's no law to back it up, or if it breaks the big rule book, the order is just a piece of paper.
HostThat seems like a really shaky way to run a country. If things can just flip back and forth every four or eight years when a new person takes charge, how does anything actually stay done?
GuestIt creates a lot of back and forth, for sure. It's much faster than waiting for hundreds of people to agree on a vote, but it doesn't have the same lasting power. If you want a change to last for a long time, you really need a law. These orders are more for the here and now. They let the leader react fast to a slump in the shops or a threat from another country. But if they try to use it to do something the people or the courts really hate, they usually hit a wall. Plus, the next person to sit in that chair can just sign a new piece of paper and wipe the old order away. They spend their first week basically using an eraser on everything the last person did.
HostI guess I always thought of it as a way to go around the system. But it sounds like it's more like a part of the system that's designed to be fast, even if it's a bit flimsy.
GuestIt's a tool for a job. If you use a hammer to turn a screw, you're going to have a bad time. The courts are always looking over the leader's shoulder to make sure that pen doesn't stray too far from what the law actually says.
HostThat pen can change the day to day rules with one stroke, but it still has to stay inside the lines drawn by the big rule book.
Made with Wander
A world of curiosity you can listen to. Explore endless questions, or ask your own.
Get the app