Open in app
Cover art for How luxury brands limit supply to maintain exclusivity

How luxury brands limit supply to maintain exclusivity

Economics · 6 min listen

Get the app on mobile
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
Cover art for How luxury brands limit supply to maintain exclusivity
0:00
0:00
Transcript

HostI was walking past a high-end shop the other day and noticed something odd. There were only about three bags on the shelves, and a guard was standing by the door even though the place was empty. It felt like they were trying to hide their goods rather than sell them. I have always wondered why these places don't just open the doors and sell as much as they can to anyone with the cash. What's the goal of making it so hard for people to actually buy things?

GuestIt's a bit of a mind game, really. In a normal shop, like a grocery store, the more they sell, the more they win. But for these high-end names, the worst thing that can happen is for everyone to have their product. If you see five people on your walk to work wearing the same watch, that watch starts to feel common. And common is the one thing they can't be. They're not just selling leather or gold. They're selling the feeling that you have something others can't get. If they sold more, the name would actually be worth less. They're trading volume for a kind of magic that only comes from being rare.

HostBut that seems like a huge risk. If I have a thousand dollars to spend and a shop tells me I can't buy what I want, I'll just go somewhere else. How does turning away a paying customer actually help them make more money in the long run?

GuestWell, it changes how you look at the price. Most things get cheaper when people stop buying them. But these goods work the other way. When the price goes up, people want them even more because the high price tag is a wall that keeps others out. By limiting how many bags or shoes they make, they create a hunger. If they made ten thousand bags, they might sell them for a few hundred bucks each. But if they only make one hundred, they can charge ten thousand dollars for each one. The math works out better for them because they spend less on making the stuff but make way more on the name. It's about keeping the dream out of reach for most people so it stays a dream.

HostI don't know if I buy that. It sounds like they're just being mean to their fans. If I love a brand, I should be able to buy the hat or the belt without a struggle. Does making me wait in a line or put my name on a list really make me like them more?

GuestIt's not about being mean, it's about testing how much you want it. Think about a waitlist for a very rare car or a handmade bag. It might take two years to get it. During those two years, you're thinking about it every day. You're telling your friends that you're on the list. The wait itself becomes part of the value. It proves you have the standing and the patience to be part of their world. If you could just walk in and buy it, the thrill would be gone in a week. They're selling you the story you tell yourself while you wait.

HostSo it's all about the ego of the person buying it? That feels a bit hollow. Is there any actual business reason to keep the shelves empty, or is it just about making rich people feel special?

GuestThere's a very cold, hard business reason. It's called protecting the brand. If a brand becomes too easy to find, it starts to show up in discount stores or on sale racks. Once a luxury item is seen with a big red sale sticker on it, the magic dies. People who paid full price feel cheated, and the brand loses its power to charge those huge prices in the future. Some of these companies would rather burn their leftover stock at the end of the year than sell it at a lower price. They have to keep the supply lower than the demand at all costs to keep the price high forever.

HostWait, they actually burn the stuff? That seems like a massive waste of resources just to keep a price tag high. Surely there's a better way to handle the extra stock than just lighting it on fire.

GuestIt sounds wild, but from their view, a cheap bag in the wild is like a virus. It ruins the idea that the item is rare. They see it as a choice between losing the cost of the leather today or losing the power of their name for the next fifty years. They choose to protect the name every time. They want to make sure that every single person who owns their product feels like they're part of a very small, very lucky club. If the club gets too big, the members leave to find a new, smaller club.

HostI still find it hard to believe that the internet hasn't ruined this. Nowadays, you can find anything on a resale site. Does that not break the wall they're trying to build?

GuestIt actually makes the wall taller. If you see a bag selling for double its original price on a resale site because the shop is out of stock, it only proves how much people want it. It builds more hype. The brands watch those sites closely. It tells them exactly how much they can raise their prices next year. They use that data to make sure they stay just out of reach. The goal is to always have one more person who wants the item than there are items for sale.

HostIt's strange to think that these companies spend so much time trying to figure out how not to sell things. It's like they're in the business of saying no.

GuestSome of the top brands will even turn you away if they don't think you fit the vibe of the shop, because the ultimate luxury isn't the bag itself, but the fact that you were allowed to buy it while everyone else was told to wait.

HostThose velvet ropes and empty shelves aren't a sign that business is slow, they're the tools used to make sure the dream stays rare enough to be worth the price.

Made with Wander

A world of curiosity you can listen to. Explore endless questions, or ask your own.

Get the app