Open in app
Cover art for How the stirrup changed medieval warfare

How the stirrup changed medieval warfare

History · 5 min listen

Get the app on mobile
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
Cover art for How the stirrup changed medieval warfare
0:00
0:00
Transcript

HostWe usually think of history turning on big, messy events like a massive war or a new law. But sometimes, it's just a tiny piece of metal that flips the world on its head. I'm talking about the stirrup. It's just a little loop for your foot, but people say it's what truly built the middle ages. It seems like such a small thing to hold up a whole way of life. How does a simple footrest turn a guy on a horse into something so much more powerful?

GuestWell, if you think about it, riding a horse into a fight is actually pretty tough without them. Before the stirrup showed up in Europe, you were basically just sitting on top of the animal and hoping for the best. You had to grip the horse with your knees as hard as you could. If you tried to poke someone with a spear, the force of the hit would just slide you right off the back of your own horse. You were loose. The stirrup changes that because it locks you in. It lets you stand up, it lets you lean, and most of all, it lets you use the horse's weight instead of just your own arm.

HostI don't know, I have seen people ride without them and they seem pretty steady. Is it really that big of a leap from just holding on with your legs to having a little step for your feet?

GuestIt's a huge leap because of how you use your weapons. Imagine you're holding a long, heavy pole, which back then was called a lance. Without stirrups, you have to throw that spear or poke with it using your shoulder. But with stirrups, you can tuck that lance under your arm and brace your feet. Now, when you hit someone, you're not just hitting them with your arm. You're hitting them with the weight of a half-ton horse running at full speed. You and the horse become one single, solid object. It's like the difference between being hit by a guy throwing a rock and being hit by a truck. That change, where the rider and horse are joined together as one tool of war, is what made the heavy knight possible.

HostSo it's not just about staying on, it's about being able to hit harder. But that makes me wonder about the rest of the outfit. If you're hitting that hard, you're probably getting hit back just as hard. Does this lead to all that heavy metal armor we see in movies?

GuestIt does. Once you have riders who can't be easily knocked off, and who are hitting with huge power, everyone has to start wearing more protection. You get this race to see who can be the toughest. The armor gets thicker, the helmets get heavier, and the horses have to be bigger and stronger to carry all that weight. But here is the catch: all of that's really pricey. A good horse, a full suit of metal, and the time it takes to learn how to use them costs a fortune. It's not like a bow and arrow that you can give to a farmer. This is gear for the rich.

HostOkay, but I'm struggling to see how a piece of metal for your feet creates a whole way of life with lords and kings. It feels like a stretch to say a footrest made the middle ages look the way they did.

GuestIt sounds wild, but think about the money. Since this new way of fighting was so pricey, the kings needed a way to pay for these fighters. They didn't have piles of cash sitting around back then. What they had was land. So, the king would give a chunk of land to a fighter, and in return, that fighter would use the money from that land to buy his horse, his armor, and his stirrups. Then he would go to war whenever the king called. That's the heart of the whole system. The stirrup made the knight the most important thing on the field, and the land was just the way to keep the knight ready. Without that specific way of fighting, the whole reason for having lords and knights might never have happened the same way.

HostBut surely there were other things going on? I mean, a bit of mud or a rainy day can stop a horse in its tracks. Is it not a bit much to give all the credit to one little invention?

GuestYou're right to be unsure. Plenty of people argue that we play up the stirrup too much. After all, the Romans didn't use them and they did just fine for a long time. And you're right about the land, too. If the ground is wet or if the other side has a row of long poles, those fancy knights are in big trouble. It wasn't like a magic button that won every fight. But it did change the main goal of how to win. It shifted the aim from big groups of men on foot to these small groups of very powerful riders. It stayed that way for hundreds of years because, on a clear field, nothing could stand in their way.

HostSo it's more about how it changed who had the power than just who won a single battle.

GuestYeah, it made the guy on the horse the center of the world for a while. And it stayed that way until things like gunpowder came along and made all that expensive armor feel like a tin can. But for a few hundred years, the way your feet sat in those loops decided who owned the land and who made the laws.

HostIt's strange to think that even with all that power, a simple rainy day and some soft ground could still bring the whole thing to a halt.

GuestThe stirrup gave the rider a solid base, but the horse still had to find its own footing on the shifting earth.

HostThat little iron loop turned a simple rider into a human wall, and in doing so, it rebuilt the whole world around the shape of a saddle.

Made with Wander

A world of curiosity you can listen to. Explore endless questions, or ask your own.

Get the app