Open in app
Cover art for Turning genes back on without cutting DNA

Turning genes back on without cutting DNA

Science · 6 min listen

Get the app on mobile
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
Cover art for Turning genes back on without cutting DNA
0:00
0:00
Transcript

HostWe often think of our DNA as a set of rules that are set in stone from the moment we're born. But it turns out our genes are more like a massive library where some of the books have been locked away or hidden behind a curtain. I was reading about a new way that scientists are trying to get into that library and pull those books back out without actually changing the writing on the pages. How do we actually go into a living cell and turn a gene back on if we aren't allowed to cut the DNA?

GuestIt helps to think of your DNA not as a fixed list of commands, but as a string of instructions that can be hidden or shown. Your body uses these tiny chemical marks, kind of like little pieces of tape, to cover up certain genes. When a gene is covered with these marks, the cell just skips over it. The instruction is still there, the code hasn't changed at all, but the cell acts like it doesn't exist. This is usually a good thing because you don't want your skin cells trying to act like heart cells. But sometimes, the cell accidentally puts tape over a gene you really need to stay healthy. In the past, if we wanted to fix a genetic problem, we thought we had to cut the DNA and paste in something new. Now, we're learning how to just reach in and peel that tape off. We call this epigenetic editing, and it’s basically like deep cleaning your DNA instead of rewriting it.

HostWait, if we already have tools like CRISPR that can cut and paste DNA, why would we go through the trouble of making a version that doesn't cut anything? It sounds like trying to fix a car without opening the hood.

GuestWell, cutting DNA is actually pretty risky. When you use those traditional molecular scissors to snip a gene, you’re breaking the physical strand. The cell tries to sew it back together, but it’s a messy process. You can end up with accidental mutations or scars in the code that you didn't intend to create. It's a bit like using a chainsaw to fix a leaky pipe. You might fix the leak, but you could also take out a weight bearing wall by mistake. By not cutting the DNA, we avoid that damage entirely. We use a modified version of those famous scissors, but we have basically ground the blades down so they can't cut. This broken version of the tool still knows exactly how to find a specific spot in your DNA, but instead of cutting, it just carries a little chemical eraser to that spot. It finds the tape, rubs it away, and the gene becomes visible to the cell again.

HostThat makes sense for a quick fix, but I'm struggling with how it lasts. If you aren't changing the actual code, doesn't the cell just notice the tape is missing and put it back on the next day? It feels like the change would just fade away.

GuestThat was actually the biggest worry when people first started trying this. We thought the cell would just see an open gene and say, hey, that’s supposed to be closed, and shut it back down. But we're finding out that cells have a surprisingly long memory. Once you use these molecular erasers to scrub away the silence marks, the cell often keeps that gene open on its own. In some experiments, they have turned a gene back on and it stayed on for months, even as the cells divided and made new copies of themselves. It’s as if once you clear the dust off that hidden book in the library, the cell realizes it should've been reading it all along and keeps it on the shelf. We're still figuring out exactly why some genes stay on while others try to shut back down, but it’s proving to be much more stable than we ever expected.

HostThere has to be a catch, though. If you're going around and uncovering genes that have been hidden for years, couldn't you accidentally wake up something dangerous? I mean, don't we have old viruses and things buried in our DNA that are supposed to stay hidden?

GuestYou're hitting on the exact reason why this has to be so precise. Our DNA is full of what people call junk or dark matter, and some of those hidden spots are stayed turned off for very good reasons. There are ancient viral codes and genes that could cause out of control growth, like cancer, if they were switched back on. The danger of a tool that turns genes on is that if it lands in the wrong place, it could be a disaster. That's why the targeting part of the tool is so vital. It uses a little guide molecule that acts like a GPS coordinate to make sure the eraser only touches the one specific gene we want to help. We aren't just doing a general cleaning of the whole cell. We're going to one specific shelf, in one specific corner of the library, to uncover one specific book.

HostSo where does this actually lead us? Are we talking about a world where we can just flip a switch to fix any disease?

GuestWe're getting close to testing this for some really tough conditions. For example, there's a brain disorder called Fragile X where a single gene is accidentally turned off by these chemical marks. If we can use these erasers to peel the tape off that one gene, we might be able to help the brain function normally without ever having to risk a permanent, physical break in the person's DNA.

HostIt's amazing to think that the library was full of the right answers all along, and we just had to find a way to pull back the curtains.

GuestThe real shift is realizing that we don't always need to build a better human, we just need to help the one we have read the instructions they already carry.

HostThose hidden books have been sitting on the shelves for a lifetime, just waiting for someone to finally clear the dust and start reading.

Made with Wander

A world of curiosity you can listen to. Explore endless questions, or ask your own.

Get the app