Open in app
Cover art for Why some ideas explode while others fail

Why some ideas explode while others fail

Psychology · 5 min listen

Get the app on mobile
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
Cover art for Why some ideas explode while others fail
0:00
0:00
Transcript

HostI was thinking today about how we all end up watching the same video or humming the same song at the same time. It feels like the stuff that wins must just be better than the rest, right? But I was reading about a study where researchers set up a few different digital worlds for people to listen to music. In each world, the songs were the same, but the hits were totally different. It makes me wonder what's actually going on when something takes over the world.

GuestThat study is a perfect way to see how the world really works. We like to think that the best stuff naturally rises to the top, but those music worlds showed us that quality is really just a starting point. It's a baseline you have to hit to even be in the game, but it doesn't tell us who will win. What the researchers found was that in the worlds where people could see what others were downloading, a few songs would get a tiny lead early on. Then, because they looked popular, more people clicked them. This is called the success breeds success loop. Once a song or an idea gets that little head start, it starts to roll like a snowball. The songs that became huge hits in one world were often the ones that bombed in another. It had almost nothing to do with the song itself being better or worse. It was all about which one happened to get that first bit of luck.

HostSo it's just a roll of the dice? That feels a bit bleak. I mean, surely there's something about the idea itself that makes us want to pass it on to a friend.

GuestWell, there is. But it's not about how smart or important the idea is. It's about how it makes your body feel. When we look at why things go viral, it usually comes down to high energy feelings. Think about things like awe, or anger, or even a bit of anxiety. These feelings flip a switch in your body. They put you in a state of readiness where your heart beats a little faster and you feel like you need to take action. Sharing that video or that story acts as a way to let off that steam. It's a physical relief.

HostBut we share sad things all the time, do we not? Like those heartbreaking videos for a good cause. Those seem to go everywhere.

GuestActually, pure sadness is a bit of a dead end for a craze. Sadness is what we call a low energy feeling. It tends to shut us down and make us go quiet, which is the opposite of what you need for something to spread. If you see a cause that's just sad, you might feel for it, but you're less likely to hit that share button. For those sad causes to actually explode, they have to be framed differently. They have to make you feel moral outrage or a huge sense of hope. You need that buzz in your chest to move your finger to the button. It's the physical jolt of the emotion, not just the fact that the message is important, that really powers the spread.

HostThat makes sense for the feeling, but what about the people who start it? We always hear about influencers being the ones who make or break a trend. Does it not just come down to having the right famous person talk about it?

GuestSurprisingly, no. The structure of the crowd matters way more than the person at the microphone. For a craze to take off, you need a network of people who are ready to be influenced by those right next to them. There's a strange trick our brains play on us called the Majority Illusion. It happens when a few very busy, very connected people in your small circle start doing something. Because you see three or four friends doing it, your brain assumes that everyone in the world is doing it. You feel like you're being left behind, so you jump in. It's like a stampede. It doesn't matter if the rest of the world has never heard of the idea; if it looks big in your own little corner, you treat it like it's the new rule of the land.

HostSo it's about the group being primed for it. But how many people does it actually take to move from a small group of friends to something that everyone just accepts as common sense?

GuestThere's actually a specific number for that. Computer models show that you only need a very committed group of about ten percent of the population. Before you hit that ten percent mark, trying to spread a new idea is like pushing a heavy rock uphill. It takes a ton of work and persuasion. But once ten out of every hundred people are truly all in, the math changes. The idea stops needing a hard sell and starts spreading through random neighbors in the group. The time it takes for the rest of society to follow drops off a cliff. That's why a cause can simmer in the background for years and then suddenly, seemingly overnight, it becomes the only thing anyone is talking about.

HostThat ten percent mark sounds like the moment the snowball finally gets too big to stop.

GuestExactly, and at that point, the idea moves through random neighbors rather than needing a hard sell.

HostSo those hits in the music experiment didn't win because they were better than the others; they were just the lucky ones that reached that tipping point where everyone else assumed they had to listen too.

Made with Wander

A world of curiosity you can listen to. Explore endless questions, or ask your own.

Get the app