Open in app
Cover art for Why the silence of 4'33" is considered a musical masterpiece

Why the silence of 4'33" is considered a musical masterpiece

Arts · 5 min listen

Get the app on mobile
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
Cover art for Why the silence of 4'33" is considered a musical masterpiece
0:00
0:00
Transcript

HostIn August of nineteen fifty-two, a group of people gathered in a small hall in Woodstock, New York, to hear a program of new piano music. The pianist, a man named David Tudor, walked out and sat down at the piano. But instead of playing, he just closed the keyboard lid and looked at a stopwatch. He sat there for exactly four minutes and thirty-three seconds without playing a single note.

HostIt sounds like the start of a prank, but this moment became one of the most famous and argued about pieces of art in the world. Why would anyone want to listen to four minutes of nothing?

GuestWell, that's the thing. It wasn't actually nothing. That piece is called four minutes and thirty-three seconds, and it was written by the composer John Cage. Cage wanted people to realize that there's no such thing as real silence. Since it was a rainy night and the doors to the hall were left open, the audience started hearing things they usually ignore. In the first part, they heard the wind blowing through the trees. In the second part, they heard rain tapping on the roof. By the third part, they were hearing themselves—people whispering or walking out in frustration because they were so annoyed.

GuestThe big idea here is that silence doesn't actually exist. It's just a shift in where you put your attention. Instead of focusing on the performer to give you sound, you focus on the world around you. Cage wasn't offering a blank space; he was opening a window so the audience could hear the world as if it were a formal composition.

HostBut if you really wanted to find silence, couldn't you just go into a soundproof room? I mean, surely we have the technology to make things truly quiet if we want to.

GuestCage actually tried that. He visited a special lab at Harvard called an anechoic chamber. It’s a room built with thick padding on the walls to soak up every tiny bit of noise. He thought that inside that room, he would finally hear what nothing sounds like. But once he was in there, he still heard two sounds. One was very high and one was very low. When he asked an engineer about it, the guy told him the high sound was his own nervous system working, and the low one was his blood moving through his body.

HostSo even in a room built to be dead quiet, you're still a noise machine.

GuestExactly. That was the huge turning point for him. He realized that as long as we're alive, there's going to be sound. Because of that, he decided the old way of thinking about music was too small. People used to say music was just sounds that we organize on purpose. Cage argued that sounds we don't mean to make are just as real and just as good as the ones we plan out.

HostI can see why that would upset people. It feels like he’s saying anything is music, which makes it feel a bit like he didn't put any work into it. Was he just sitting there making it up as he went?

GuestThat’s a common mistake people make. They think it was just a joke or that he was being lazy, but it's a very strict piece of work. There's an actual score for it. It’s divided into three separate parts, and for each one, the sheet music has a specific instruction to stay quiet. Even the time itself might have a hidden meaning. Four minutes and thirty-three seconds is two hundred and seventy-three seconds. Some people point out that minus two hundred and seventy-three degrees is absolute zero, the temperature where everything stops moving.

HostThat's a very specific number to land on just by accident.

GuestCage actually said he used a Chinese book of symbols called the I Ching to pick the times by chance. But the point is that he provided a rigid structure. By giving the audience three movements and a ticking clock, he was framing the random noises of the room. He was forcing people to treat a bird chirping or a floorboard creaking with the same deep respect they would give a famous symphony.

HostIt still feels like a tough deal for the audience. Usually, I go to a show to see someone else do something impressive. Here, it feels like I'm doing all the heavy lifting.

GuestThat's the heart of why people still fight about this seven decades later. Usually, the artist provides the content and the audience just sits back and takes it. Cage flipped that. He said the artist only provides the frame—the time and the place—and the audience has to provide the content by how they choose to listen. The whole debate isn't really about whether silence is music. It’s about whether music is the sound itself or the intention of the person listening.

GuestFor Cage, music wasn't just a craft where you make sounds. It was a way of practicing how to be aware of the world you're living in right now.

HostThat stopwatch in Woodstock wasn't just counting down to the end of a show, it was timing the world itself.

Made with Wander

A world of curiosity you can listen to. Explore endless questions, or ask your own.

Get the app