Open in app
Cover art for Why travelers choose detour destinations over famous cities

Why travelers choose detour destinations over famous cities

Travel · 5 min listen

Get the app on mobile
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
Cover art for Why travelers choose detour destinations over famous cities
0:00
0:00
Transcript

HostWe all have that list of places we want to see. The huge cities with the big lights that show up in every movie. But lately, those spots feel more like a crowd than a dream. It's hard to enjoy a view when you're elbow to elbow with a thousand other people.

HostWhy are so many people looking at the map and picking the quiet town an hour away instead?

GuestWell, it's becoming a real shift in how we think about a trip. People in the travel world are starting to call these detour destinations. The idea is pretty simple. Instead of going to the famous city everyone knows, you go to a smaller place nearby that has the same feel but less of the mess. Think of it like this. If you want to see the old buildings and eat the great food of a place like Paris, you might skip the Eiffel Tower and head a bit north to a city like Antwerp. You still get the cobblestones and the history, but you can actually breathe while you walk down the street. A big travel group lately found that people are looking for these spots more than ever because the big cities have just become too much to handle.

HostHmm, so is this mostly just a way for people to save a bit of money? I mean, the big cities are always the most expensive, so it feels like a budget move.

GuestThat's part of it, sure. Your money goes much further when you're not paying the tourist tax of a world famous spot. But it's deeper than just the wallet. There's this feeling of being part of a crowd that's just checking boxes. When you go to the place everyone knows, you feel like you have to see the big museum and the big church and the big bridge. It starts to feel like work. When you take a detour to a town like Lucca instead of going to Florence, that pressure just drops away. You're not there to see one specific thing. You're there to just be there. You find a little coffee shop that's not made for tourists, and you realize the milk tastes better and the people are nicer because they're not worn out by millions of visitors.

HostBut wait, if I go to the town next door, am I not just missing out on the real deal? If I go all the way to Italy and I don't see the big art in Florence, did I even go?

GuestThat's the trade off, right? But what people are finding is that the real deal in the big cities is getting harder to find. It's buried under gift shops and fast food made for travelers. In the smaller towns, you're seeing how people actually live today. You see the kids playing in the square and the grandmas hanging the laundry. It feels more like a real life and less like a theme park. Plus, social media has changed things. There's this new idea of the destination dupe. People want to find the spot that looks like the famous one but feels fresh and new. It's like finding a hidden gem before everyone else finds it.

HostI worry about those hidden gems, though. If we all start flooding into these quiet towns, do we not just ruin the very thing we went there for? It feels like we're just moving the crowd from one place to another.

GuestYou're hitting on the big worry. It's a double edged sword. For the local people in these smaller towns, having more travelers can be a great thing. It brings in money for the shops and helps keep the old buildings standing. But if it happens too fast, it can break the spirit of the place. The rent goes up for the people who live there, and the quiet streets get loud. We have seen it happen in places that get famous on the internet overnight. One day it's a sleepy village, and the next day there's a line of people waiting to take the same photo for their feed. The key is how the town handles it. Some spots are trying to be smart about it, making sure the growth doesn't kill the soul of the town.

HostSo is the famous city just over? Are we done with the big names for good?

GuestNot at all. The big cities will always have that pull. There's only one Rome and only one Tokyo. But the way we visit them is changing. Maybe you stay in a smaller town nearby and just take the train into the big city for a day. Or maybe you spend most of your time in the detour spot and realize you don't even need the big city anymore. It makes the map feel much bigger. Instead of everyone pointing their cameras at the same ten buildings, we're spreading out. It's better for the planet and probably better for our heads, too. Travelers are starting to value peace and a real connection over just seeing the famous thing.

HostIt's a bit like we're learning how to explore again instead of just following a guide.

GuestThe big question is how these towns will hold on to their own ways when the whole world shows up.

HostThose quiet streets in the town next door might just be the new center of the world.

Made with Wander

A world of curiosity you can listen to. Explore endless questions, or ask your own.

Get the app